top of page
Writer's pictureJames Goins

The Challenges of Composing Music in the Age of AI

By James A. Goins

AI Robot sampling music like water


The landscape of music composition, particularly for television, film, and new media, has undergone a seismic shift with the rise of AI deep learning models. These algorithms, trained on vast libraries of music from the past 500 years, can now replicate nearly any style, genre, or mood with remarkable accuracy. For composers who have traditionally relied on their unique voices to create soundtracks that resonate with audiences, this presents a daunting challenge.


AI tools can analyze millions of pieces of music, extract patterns, and compose new works that imitate styles as varied as Baroque classical, romantic film scores, jazz, or modern electronic compositions. Composers for hire in the entertainment industry now find themselves competing with these AI-generated soundtracks, which can be produced in a fraction of the time and at a lower cost.


Case Study: AI in Action


One of the most striking examples of AI's influence in the music world is AIVA (Artificial Intelligence Virtual Artist), a program that has already composed music for video games, commercials, and film scores. AIVA was trained on the works of renowned composers like Beethoven, Mozart, and Bach, giving it the ability to generate symphonic pieces that sound convincingly human. Similarly, OpenAI's Jukedeck, which could create custom royalty-free music, has opened the door for creators to have instant music solutions with a few clicks, posing a direct challenge to human composers.


Netflix, too, has experimented with AI-driven music generation. AI-based tools have been used to create mood-based soundtracks tailored to specific scenes, which means that a director could, theoretically, have custom-made music for every moment of a film without involving a single composer.


The Threat to Composers


At the heart of this challenge is the fear of obsolescence. AI doesn't tire, doesn't need inspiration, and can churn out compositions in seconds. It can learn from centuries of musical evolution and apply those lessons in ways that mimic the genius of human creators. In a world where budgets are tight and timelines short, AI offers a tempting alternative to traditional music composition.


One of the dangers of this shift is the homogenization of music. AI may be able to replicate the technical aspects of a given style, but it often lacks the emotional depth and nuance that comes from a lived human experience. If AI-driven music dominates, we may end up with soundscapes that feel empty, devoid of the soul and intention that comes from a human being pulling from their own unique, emotional wellspring.


Another issue is the ethical dilemma around intellectual property. AI models, like those used in deep learning for music, are trained on vast databases of existing works. Composers may find their signature styles imitated or even copied, without attribution or compensation. This raises critical questions about ownership and the future of creative rights in an AI-driven world.


Hope for the Future: Human Creativity Unmatched


Despite the rise of AI-generated music, there remains an inherent advantage that human composers will always have: the power to create from a place of emotional truth. While AI can simulate mood, structure, and genre, it cannot experience life. It cannot capture the depth of a human story or convey the same authenticity of feeling that a person can. Music is not simply an arrangement of sounds and notes; it is a form of communication, a language of emotion that transcends technical execution.


Historically, technology has often been seen as a threat to creative fields, yet human artistry has always endured. For example, the invention of the camera was feared by painters, but instead of replacing painting, it expanded the boundaries of visual art. Similarly, AI can push composers to new heights, encouraging them to experiment with new forms, hybridize genres, and embrace their emotional and spiritual selves more fully in their work.


One hopeful outcome lies in the collaboration between AI and composers. Musicians can use AI as a tool, much like synthesizers, samplers, and digital audio workstations, to enhance their creative process. By embracing AI as a partner rather than a competitor, composers can explore new possibilities that were previously out of reach.


Why Human Creations Will Rise Above


Human beings create music as an extension of their soul, reflecting personal experiences, emotions, and philosophies. A composer may draw from memories, pain, joy, and their understanding of the world in ways that AI cannot replicate. AI may learn the rules of composition, but it will never understand why humans create in the first place. It cannot know loss, love, hope, or despair—and this lack of inner life is what separates AI-generated music from human compositions.


Moreover, audiences often connect with music because it tells a story, speaks to their own experiences, or conveys the humanity of the artist behind it. This connection is something AI will never fully understand. As long as people seek authenticity, emotional depth, and human connection, there will always be a place for composers who pour their hearts and souls into their work.


In conclusion, while AI poses challenges to composers by offering cheaper, faster alternatives to human creativity, it will never replace the emotional depth and nuanced storytelling that comes from human creation. By embracing technology as a tool rather than a threat, composers can continue to produce music that resonates on a deeply human level—ensuring that the future of music remains rooted in the heart, not in code.

Recent Posts

See All

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page